?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Apr. 21st, 2002

Lance is such a goober. But he's a loveable goober.

Comments

( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
exxiep
Apr. 22nd, 2002 07:15 am (UTC)
Ahhhh...crap! Stop posting cute pictures of Lance! Don't you see? I'm trying to be over him! OVER HIM!!! Arrrrgggggh.

(This comment inspired by arms, hands, and a nice pair of jeans. Damn.))
sweatergurl
Apr. 22nd, 2002 10:51 am (UTC)
Re:
Hey man, it comes with the territory. You have me for a friend you get cute pictures of Lance :) At least this time I said it was Lance so you kind of had a little bit of warning . And it was behind a link. :) Also, there is no getting over Lance. Once he has you he doesn't let you go.
exxiep
Apr. 22nd, 2002 10:59 am (UTC)
Re:
No. I'm stronger than that. I WILL be over him. And I mean that entirely metaphorically. As long as he gets rid of his arms, hands, and those jeans. And puts on ugly pants, I mean. Not to go around semi-nude. I don't want that.
sweatergurl
Apr. 22nd, 2002 11:04 am (UTC)
Re:
heh, you did see the underwear picture I posted, yes? That was just for you. :) I really felt you needed to see that. It really shouldn't be as hot as it was. really. they weren't even sexy underwear. but, his hips....and...gah. just, yes.
exxiep
Apr. 22nd, 2002 11:08 am (UTC)
Re:
Um...no...I didn't see that one. Man. I think I should though...just so I know what you're referecing. Not 'cause I want to. You see.
exxiep
Apr. 22nd, 2002 11:12 am (UTC)
Re:
Umm...okay. I saw it. And. Um. See. No, that's not sexy underwear. But. There's things. Underneath that underwear. That. You know. Haa. Yes.
sweatergurl
Apr. 22nd, 2002 11:27 am (UTC)
Re:
Yes. I know. It really shouldn't be that hot. But it is! things underneath. yes. that, you know, are almost showing! and yet, not. must look some more.
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )